Quantcast
Channel: Crystal Cox Blogger ~ Industry Whistleblower Crystal L. Cox Investigative Blogger
Viewing all 505 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Nevada attorney Marc Randazza clearly Admits to having BEEN Blogger Crystal Cox's attorney yet swore to a federal court that he was NOT. Marc Randazza agrees to "bow out" as Crystal Cox's attorney then claims he was NEVER her attorney in the first place.

April 15, 2015, 11:02 am
$
0
0
Attorney Marc Randazza continues to FLAT OUT LIE in Court Motions and Claim he was not Crystal Cox's attorney yet there is so much proof that he was her attorney and that he harmed Cox, deliberately and maliciously to retaliate against his former client and SUPPRESS her Free Speech.


"REQUEST NO. 3:

Anyway phone records, emails, faxes, mail, or records of documentation of any kind between
you and anyone, including and not limited to Judge Marco Hernandez, Michael Spreadbury, ...., Martin Cain, Lara Pearson, Alexandria Mayers, Sean Boushie, Peter L. Michaelson, Eric Turkewitz, Leo Mulville, Jordan Rushie, Kenneth P. White, Ari Bass aKa Michael Whiteacre, Sean Tompkins, Eugene Volokh, Liberty Media Company and all associates, any Porn company what so ever, Stephen Lamont, Pamela Simon, Ted Bernstein, Alan Rose or any other party, in which you made statement to about Crystal Cox in any way and especially whereby you accused Cox of criminal activity.


"RESPONSE TO REQUEST NO. 3:

Counterdefendant objects to Request No. 3 on the grounds that the request is unintelligible,
overly broad, unduly burdensome, vague, ambiguous, lacks specificity, and requests documents
which are neither relevant nor reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible
evidence.

Counterdefendant further objects as the request seeks documents which are protected by
the attorney/client privilege and/or work product privilege. Furthermore, some of the documents
requested are, or should be, in Cox’s possession – for example, communications with Eugene
Volokh, her attorney. Such discovery requests should be directed at him. "

Source of Marc Randazza Response
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiUHBIcDltaWRKQ28/edit

Odd that Marc Randazza is claiming attorney client protection when he claims he was not my attorney. He STOLE my work product but seems to think his "work product" has value and worth but mine can just be STOLEN ???



INTERROGATORY NO. 21:

Did you have phone conversations with Eugene Volokh and state that you represented Cox and
discuss with him your strategy, or a deal you were trying to make with the opposition, Plaintiff’s
attorney David Aman?

RESPONSE TO INTERROGATORY NO. 21:

"Counterdefendant objects to Interrogatory No. 21 on the grounds that it is vague, ambiguous,
overly broad, not limited in time and scope, and seeks information which is neither relevant nor
reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.

Counterdefendant further objects because this interrogatory is in excess of the 25 allowable
interrogatories pursuant to Rule 33(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As a result,
Counterdefendant is not required to respond to the same. Subject to and without waiving the
foregoing objections, Counterdefendant responds as follows:

Counterdefendant spoke with Eugene Volokh in December 2011. 

Randazza informed Volkokh that if he was going to represent Cox, that Randazza would gladly bow out, and defer to Volokh to handle the case.

Volokh, however, said that he would prefer that Randazza co-counsel the case with him due to Volokh’s stated lack of litigation experience. Counterdefendant and Volokh discussed possible strategies that he and Volokh thought might be good ideas during that call.

Counterdefendant and Volokh both discussed the fact that Cox’s interests would be better served
through settlement."

Source ( Page 18 )
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiM0hkaW9IYVV2VGc/view?usp=sharing


Why in the world would you would you "bow out" Mr Randazza if you were NEVER My attorney in the first place? What gives you the right to choose for me, make decision for me and to bow out as my attorney if you are saying that you were not my attorney ??? Hmmm


How in the world does attorney Marc Randazza have the legal right to bow out and to "defer" me, the client to another attorney and then defer to that attorney on the case?

WOW, Marc Randazza world's biggest Hypocrite Attorney.
↧
Search

Hypoocrite Attorney Marc Randazza filed a frivolous SLAPP lawsuit in Nevada to SUPPRESS the Free Speech and First Amendment Rights of Investigative Blogger Monica Foster. Yet he pretends to love all Free Speech

April 15, 2015, 11:18 am
$
0
0
Marc Randazza has engaged in a campaign to "scrub" consumer review sites against him. I, Crystal Cox was harmed by Marc Randazza, he acted as my attorney. I have every right to review him, yet he removed massive online sites of mine, sued me for millions, sued one of my sources of corruption, and has engaged in massive harassment and legal actions in multiple courts to scrub the internet of sites reviewing him, yet files this motion in exact opposite of his own hypocritical actions.

Marc Randazza has violated the rights of Blogger Crystal Cox and yet presents the opposited case in District Court State of Nevada, County of Clark Eighth Judicial District A-14-69 8267- C.
as he sues blogger Monica Foster / Alexandra Mayers to SUPPRESS HER FIRST AMENTMENT RIGHTS IN A NEVADA SLAPP SUIT.

THE CASE BELOW RANDAZZA BENEFITS FROM SLAPP LAWS. \

Yet with US, his victims, he uses the SLAPP law to shield from countercomplaints when he clearly files SLAPP SUITS.



Marc Randazza has engaged in a campaign to "scrub" consumer review sites of any negative reviews by filing a SLAPP baseless lawsuit against Crystal Cox, Eliot Bernstein, and Alexandra Mayers.

Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group filed Randazza v. Cox and Randazza v. Godaddy to suppress my free speech, harass my sources, remove negative online content about him and his law firm in the hopes of intimidating me, Crystal Cox and my sources Eliot Bernstein, Diana Grandmason and Alexandra Mayers (Monica Foster).

All in this harassing case above is exactly what Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group has done to blogger Crystal Cox.

Crystal Cox moves to dismiss based on SLAPP and is Denied, Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group moves to dismiss, claims SLAPP and prevails and now sues for legal fees, WOW.

Marc Randazza is NOT above the LAW and should not have special privileges to sue bloggers and prevail on Nevada SLAPP law he, himself got into law. Look Deep folks, Marc Randazza is a LIAR, a THUG, a hypocrite, a rights violating attorney, and a seriously UNCONSTITUTIONAL LAWYER.




↧
↧

Randazza v. Cox; Court DENIES yet another begging blathering motion to dismiss Cox's VALID Defamation and Malpractice CLAIMS. Court DENIES and RANDAZZA then whines to the Ninth Circuit.

April 15, 2015, 12:18 pm
$
0
0
"Randazza first moves to dismiss Cox’s counterclaims under Nevada’s anti-SLAPP law, NRS 41.660"

Marc Randazza filed a SLAPP lawsuit against his former client Crystal Cox to suppress her speech. Yet he tries to claim SLAPP as a defense against her defamation and malpractice claim. And does this wayyyy after she filed those claims.

Court Says,  "I find Randazza’s special motion to dismiss was not filed by NRS 41.660’s 60-day deadline and that the filing delay is not supported by good cause. I therefore deny the special motion to dismiss. I also deny Randazza’s motion to strike Cox’s answer and enter default because claimdispositive sanctions are presently unwarranted. Cox has not been explicitly warned that such sanctions could issue if she continues to disregard court rules and file frivolous motions, and I decline to take such a draconian step without first warning her of this possibility."

THE COURT DENIED RANDAZZA MOTIONS TO DISMISS COX'S COUNTERCLAIM OVER AND OVER. YET HE DESPERATELY KEEPS BEGGING FOR ANOTHER WAY.

COURT SAYS;   "A. Special Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 224] Randazza specially moves for dismissal of Cox’s remaining counterclaims for defamation and malpractice under NRS 41.660, which provides protections for defendants in Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP).

Succinctly, “[a] SLAPP suit is a meritless lawsuit that a party initiates primarily to chill a defendant’s exercise of his or her First Amendment free speech rights.” 

A SLAPP claimant typically seeks “to obtain a financial advantage over one’s adversary by increasing litigation costs until the adversary’s case is weakened or abandoned.”5 NRS 41.660 provides a special, expedited procedure for obtaining the dismissal of SLAPP suits.

But to obtain this relief, the special motion to dismiss “must be filed within 60 days after service of the complaint, which period may be extended by the court for good cause shown.”

The 60-day period “runs from the filing of the most recent amended [counterclaim].” Randazza’s special motion is late.

Cox’s last operative iteration of her counterclaims was filed on February 24, 2014, giving Randazza until April 28, 2014, to file a timely special motion under NRS 41.600. But he waited an additional four months—until August 15, 2014—to finally file it. I find Randazza’s excuse for the delay unavailing. Randazza first moved to dismiss Cox’s claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) or strike them in March 2014, and I resolved those motions in May."

CLEARLY Randazza is the one who filed a Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) against his former client Crystal Cox and not the other way around. 

"a] SLAPP suit is a meritless lawsuit that a party initiates primarily to chill a defendant’s exercise of his or her First Amendment free speech rights.” 

.. and that is just what Randazza did to his former Client Crystal Cox, yet begs the court to dismiss her VALID claims as if she filed the SLAPP SUIT.

Randazza filed a SLAPP suit  “to obtain a financial advantage over one’s adversary by increasing litigation costs until the adversary’s case is weakened or abandoned.”

He filed the case against Cox, and harassed her non-stop for nearly 3 years now. She is homeless, penniless and has no attorney, he is the one that took her intellectual property, her livlihood, and pressured her to abandon the case and do what he told her to do.

Then he files yet again to dismiss Crystal Cox's claims, as if SLAPP has anything to do with malpractice really. And the court denies this claim, as seen at the link below.

http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.241.0.pdf

Randazza then, assumedly scared shitless, filed a time stalling frivolous motion to the Ninth Circuit to appeal the above FAIR and JUST ruling as a matter of law.

Here is the Randazza v Cox, and counterclaims docket
http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html

So after the District of Nevada yet again DENIES his whiny dribble, then Mr. super duper Randazza whines to the Ninth circuit court as if he is the injured party. Hmmm ..

Here is the DOCKET for the Ninth Circuit Randazza whiny dribble appeal of the Judicial Decision above that `DENIED him super powers to squash litigants rights of due process.
http://ia601503.us.archive.org/3/items/gov.uscourts.ca9.15-15610/gov.uscourts.ca9.15-15610.docket.html

↧

My Personal Experience with Nevada Attorney Marc Randazza and the Randazza Legal Group Law Firm by Blogger Crystal Cox, Randazza's former client and target of a SLAPP suit he filed to silence me, steal my blogs, and suppress my First Amendment Rights.

April 15, 2015, 12:27 pm
$
0
0
In my experience Nevada Attorney Marc Randazza abuses the court process to create a media and blog storm of false information in order to affect court cases and get whatever it is that he wants from the target litigant, oftentimes that is simply REVENGE. 

Marc Randazza files court court motions and lawsuits against litigants, says whatever defamatory and false statement he wants, then he get's his buddies, a group of attorneys, tech bloggers, and other online media to report on the story. Another words to quote his version of the facts of the case.

These gang stalking attorneys think that if they keep posting the LIE that the courts and public will believe it, just because they are the "authority". And guess what? It works. And these flat out lies, opinions and allegations made by these "experts" in the field, attorneys and well known media are then used in court cases as actual evidence and it works, though it is NOT adjudicated. 

Such as Marc Randazza did to get a preliminary injunction against blogger Crystal Cox, me, and steal massive domain names without First Amendment Adjudication.


Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group operate in multiple states and Canada. Do you homework folks, if Marc Randazza targets you, odds are VERY high you will not win, and you will pay his legal fees to attack you. And if he really has it out for ya, he will paint you as a CRIMINAL and try and set you up for some prison time.


Marc Randazza abuses the power of the courts and his connections with media, attorneys, judges, and more to target litigants and create illusions for personal gain.

In my experience Marc Randazza uses bloggers, attorneys, court filings, motions, protective orders, his own blog, twitter and other big and small media outlets and connections to harass, defame, bully, and taunt his target. He and his “friends” do this to affect court cases, created evidence to give to judges, and to manipulate the legal process.

In my case, Randazza v. Cox, Marc Randazza, his wife Jennifer Randazza and their 3 old daughter sued me. Yes a 3 year old entered into a "contract" per say, and sued a blogger.

Marc Randazza filed the lawsuit against me, Crystal Cox, in November of 2012. After he filed the lawsuit, he did NOT bother to serve me, email me nor notify me in any way. Though he had my email because he was my attorney for a short time. And he had also emailed me threatening I either give him MarcRandazza.comor suffer the toll of him being my enemy.

Instead of contacting me, serving me. He simply stated his version of the truth and fact, in which I say are flat out lies, false information and bad law. Then he got his gang stalkers to report on the case. I believe TechDirt was the first. I did not even know I was sued and here this case was being used to defame me, trash me, and to harm other cases I was in.

I read it online and contacted the courts to serve myself so I could set the record straight. That did not work as his buddies, the courts, the judges, godaddy, legal bloggers, media; well they said whatever Marc Randazza told them to and the facts, evidence and TRUTH was simply not something they bother to or cared to look into.

Marc Randazza also used his buddies, connections, and those I am told and allege that he paid to taunt me online, to text me threats and to make me feel as if I was in constant danger, under constant surveillance and had no life I could live outside of what Marc Randazza allowed.


Purpose of Randazza v. Cox

The sole purpose of this lawsuit, this SLAPP suit with no merit, in my opinion, was simply to paint me in false light, intimidate me, cost me energy, ruin the quality of my life, ruin my reputation, and teach me a "lesson" for stand up to Marc Randazza and exercising my Free Speech to say what I wanted about him.

Marc Randazza has had my blogs removed, redirected domain names and shut down massive online content where I exercised my Free Speech and talked about him, spoke critical of him. And at the same time tries to convince the public that he is for Free Speech for all. And that I am the exception because I used his Trademark? Really? How do you speak critical of a person or business and not use their name, which Marc Randazza calls a "Trademark"?

Marc Randazza had no legal leg to stand on in this legal action and should NOT have wasted the courts time, as seen in this ORDER denying his summary judgment against me and pointing out all his legal flaws in his case.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvCFii5w-dU


Marc Randazza sues his target in order to pressure them to settle, to pay his fees, or give him what he wants, whatever that may be. In my case he wanted domain names, blogs, videos and other online content that exercised my Free Speech right to expose, report on, speak critical of and rant on Marc Randazza, Jennifer Randazza and Randazza Legal Group.

Mostly I believe in my case and in suing Monica Foster aKa Alexandra Mayers was also a woman hating move, a I will teach you a lesson, ruin your life, taunt you, destroy you and there is nothing you can do about it sort of deal. As in I am Marc Randazza and will do as I damn well please to who ever I want and there is nothing you can do about it.

Marc Randazza supports the Free Speech rights of those in prison, those who have horrific domain names, those who are racists and clearly, publicly supports Pedophiles rights to free speech. Yet he sues 2 women who stand up to him, and calls that Trademark violations? WOW.

It is rather shocking that Marc Randazza CENSORS me and Monica Foster, yet pretends he, being a porn attorney and pedophile supporter after all, is for the Free Speech rights or all. Marc Randazza often is heard saying if you love Free Speech you gotta lve it all AND the way to combat bad speech is more speech and other very hypocritical gibberish he most assuredly does not walk the talk of.


Marc Randazza abuses his Court Authority

Marc Randazza sues his target and then uses this to get private, personal business contacts, intellectual property, secrets on how they do business and who the do it with, all their domain names and businesses, names of clients and customers, phone records, your home address, emails and phone numbers of your family and ex's, and as much information he can get.

Marc Randazza uses his lawsuit to then be an officer of the court and get phone companies, churches, registrars and anyone else he wants to give him YOUR private information and they DO IT, trusting that he, as an attorney, as an officer of the court is obeying the LAW; when clearly he is NOT.

NO one seems to hold him accountable and they even seem to fear him for some reason; he is "well connected" and your constitutional rights are out the window.

How Does Marc Randazza, an attorney convince 3rd party vendors, phone companies, pastors, churches, accountants, friends, family, clients, ex's, customers and more to GIVE him YOUR PRIVATE INFORMATION... ???

Well you see Marc Randazza threatens to sue them, subpoena them and well they are afraid of legal fees, time from work or a "scene" of some kind so they turn this information over to this officer of the court, even though it VIOLATES your rights to privacy.

Marc Randazza defends celebrities and other "folk" on their right to privacy in emails, yet he took my private emails to him and others, even though he was my attorney and even though it violated the rules of evidence, constitution and privacy rights, he and his gang stalking buddies used my private emails out of context and with their insinuations of what I must have meant, to ruin my life, defame me, harass me, bully me and attack me.

All the while creating an online buzz of their buddies (the gang stalkers) and influencing potential jurors and the courts, as well as printing out their lies and submitting it as FACTUAL evidence. Judges, such as Judge Gloria Navarro eat this up and consider it fact and give Marc Randazza your life's work, your domains, your blogs, your rights, and your intellectual property ALL based on LIES and non adjudicated nonsense they submit as evidence.


And there is NOTHING you can do about it; YEP NOTHING


Marc Randazza defends those with sick domain names such as GlenBeckRapedAndmurderedAyoungGirlin1990.com, yet he STOLE my domains such as MarcRandazza.com

more on the Glen Beck case
http://www.dmlp.org/threats/beck-v-eiland-hall

http://randazza.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/glenn-beck-decision/

https://randazza.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/d2009-1182-filed-response-brief.pdf

http://whistleblowermedia.blogspot.com/2012/12/randazza-legal-group-porn-industry.html

Marc Randazza makes the opposite argument there of course.

Randazza took many of my domain names and intellectual property with NO First Amendment Adjudication through flat out lies to WIPO and with NO Trademark. And through unconstitutional preliminary injunctions. Which as you clearly see in the Raanan Katz v. Irina Chevaldina case, Marc Randazza claimed in court motions in that case that preliminary injunctions were unconstitutional. Marc Randazza is a flat out hypocrite.

Also FOLKS, "First Amendment Rights TRUMP Trademark Laws
http://whistleblowermedia.blogspot.com/2013/01/chill-free-speech-first-amendment-legal.html

http://www.trademark-education.com/firstamendment.html

Even if you believe his lies that I attacked his child by buying a domain name, he is still a hypocrite. Marc Randazza LOVES free speech but only if he is paid to defend it. And even if I had a blog about his child, which I did not. Is that Illegal? Or is it Free Speech?

Godaddy profits from the ads, the sale of such names not me. And I have every right to use any domain I want and stand up against Marc Randazza who supports the Free Speech rights of pedophiles but sues, bullies, taunts and harasses me, Crystal Cox for years because he, a domain name lawyer was to dumb to buy his dotcom, his wife's and his child's. My point was to prove he falsifies his authority as knowledgeable in the domain name industry as the dumbass did not even have those names. Ya I called his wife a SLUT. I like sluts, it was not meant to be a slam, just what I saw to be a fact from my perspective. However, as seen on Marc Randazza's own blog he said he knocked her up in a drunken tryst so he may as well marry her. Well let's see, sex with a porn attorney, no protection ummm hmmm so many questions as to what was really going on there, the rumors are rampant on that one. Ya in my opinion and life experience, I still have to go with Slut, sorry just how I see it.

Marc Randazza is so full of it on his Trademark Allegations

Marc Randazza claims he sued Crystal Cox, me, to protect his trademark, yet he filed for the Trademark AFTER he sued me, and well ya see he claims it was to avoid confusion. Ya MarcRandazzaisAnasshole.com, RandazzaLegalGroupSucks.com, MarcRandazzaSucks.com and the dozens of others he STOLE from me ILLEGALLY and Unconstitutionally, there was NO WAY they would have confused a consumer.

Marc Randazza wanted revenge so he sued me, stalked me, subpoenaed my friends, ex's, clients, customers and even had a private investigator follow me. Marc Randazza ruined my life because he was BUTTHURT.

Then Marc Randazza claims I had a satire of his daughter, and put the photo in as evidence then his law firm represents Jennifer Randazza aKa SLUT in suing Monica Foster saying it was her parody and she is the one to be sued for this Free Speech protected PARODY.

Also at the time Marc Randazza sued me, Crystal Cox, for using his alleged (LOL) good name, oh and for calling his wife a SLUT, well he was in all manner of media defending Rush Limbaugh for calling Sandra Fluke a SLUT. Marc Randazza says it is unAmerican to suppress the free speech rights of Rush Limbaugh to call Sandra Fluke a SLUT. But Crystal Cox, me, well that's just his duty as a daddy and a husband right, to SUPPRESS my First Amendment / Free Speech Rights.

Oh wait but he defends the opposite in this video

When it comes to Free Speech, Marc Randazza says ya gotta love it all Howie, when someone called his wife a slut but when I point out the obvious slut, well I get sued, threatened, stalked, harassed, defamed, and ruined.
Ya Howie, ya gotta love it all Videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8_jVPjRtA0

But you better not call Ms. Randazza a SLUT, though in Definition well she sure seems a Slut to me and on top of that, non-protected sex with a porn attorney seems a bit irresponsible in my "Opinion". Oh then there is my Free Speech right to call whomever I want a Slut right? Being a Slut is not illegal.

Marc Randazza LOVES to flat out state, and with seemingly no regard for the law, that his "target" is GUILTY of a crime of which he has NOT the balls nor evidence to file a criminal complaint.



Marc Randazza acts as if he is pro Free Speech but sued me Crystal Cox for calling him names, exposing him and calling his wife a slut.

Marc Randazza sued Monica Foster aKa Alexandra Mayers for a parody about him. Marc Randazza is the KING of, hey I am the one dishing it out here and YOU are the one taking it. If you don’t like it I will sue you, defame you, ruin you, harass you, taunt you until you lay down and take it. Marc Randazza is a hypocrite and ABOVE THE LAW.

Links to research Marc Randazza suppressing Monica Foster’s speech and suing her for “parody” though he had claimed in federal court that I made that parody, then sues her. Oh and all this after his career or defending the Free Speech right of Parody.

Below is her Answer to the Complaint, with lot's of Exhibits
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkicnRqUTFLU2V2V2M/edit
(Randazza v. Mayers A-14-699072-C, District Court, Clark County, Nevada, Eighth Judicial District)

http://www.monicaf.com/reply.pdf

http://monicaf.com/site/?tag=marc-randazza

Marc Randazza can DISH it out but he CANNOT take it that's for sure. SUE SUE SUE.


Look Deep into the Joseph Rakofsky case, those are the same gang stalking players

http://joseph-rakofsky.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-legal-issues-and-allegation-of.html

http://josephrakofsky.blogspot.com/2013/02/was-joseph-rakofsky-slapp-suit-or-was.html

http://whistleblowermedia.blogspot.com/2013/02/rabid-hypocritical-lawyer-cries.html

http://josephrakofsky.blogspot.com/

The Joseph Rakofsky case has tons of internet posts from Marc Randazza's gang stalking group. They used the internet to make the case look like something is what not. Joseph Rakofsky was telling the truth and all these same guys are stalking, lying and ganging up on a lot of us, hence a RICO.

Look at all the Documents of the Joseph Rakofsky v. the Internet; Marc Randazza and his GANG are all there defending each other and I allege flat out lying about the facts of the case.



Look deep into Righthaven and many other cases where the same group of attorneys taunt, gang stalk and create an illusion online. They pick a target and together legal bloggers such as Popehat.com’s Kenneth White of Brown, White and Newhouse Law Firm, Tracy Coenen of Sequence Inc., Kashmir Hill of Forbes and formerly of AboveTheLaw.com, Jordan Rushie of Philly Law Blog (he is now a Randazza Legal Group attorney), Bob Garfield of New York Public Radio, Godaddy, Lawyer and blogger Mark Bennett of Bennett and Bennett Law Firm,Lawyer Scott H. Greenfield of the Simple Justice Blog,  Eric Turkewitz of Turkewitz Law Firm, and more.

Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group also use Marc’s connections to Peter L. Michaelson of “Mediator & Arbitrator with Michaelson ADR Chambers” and INTA, in order to get WIPO, the World Intellectual Property Organization, to defame, harass, tarness, ruin, threaten and bully his target.

Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group use WIPO as they are a highly credible international organization and what WIPO says is BELIEVED, even if it has no base in fact whatsoever and only the word of one Lawyer who flat out lied to them, Marc Randazza.


This group of gang stalkers are believed by the courts, judges and the public over their TARGET as they have credentials and clout and this forces people into settlement’s and Randazza usually gets his way.

This rogue group is acting illegally, and there is plenty of pattern and history which is why I, Crystal L. Cox tried to file a RICO Lawsuit against them and was denied

Here are links to research that

Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group have been known to sue someone and force them to pay the legal fees to do it and Judge Gloria Navarro assists them. They take a case for FREE allegedly then force their clients to pay.

More on that topic


Pro Bono Scam



I ALLEGE that Marc Randazza files legal documents, lawsuits and court motions with the premeditate willful and wanton intent to defame, attack, and flat out lie about his “Target” then he gets his attorney buddies to all post on the case and to quote him, as if it were adjudicated fact, when it's only the words of one attorney out to get whatever he wants out of that particular case.

They use the laws that protect court documents to defame and destroy their target. Then these blogs of lies and opinions of Rogue Attorneys become “Evidence” to further destroy their target.


A Quote from the Recent Roca Labs case 
filed against Marc Randazza

"Despite being an Officer of the Court and a practicing member of the Florida Bar, RANDAZZA has waged his war against ROCA by intentionally and maliciously publishing many false and defamatory statements in his pleadings, with the intent to share them to his contacts in the media, and indeed by directly speaking to the media about ROCA with the intent to have them publish false, misleading and defamatory articles about ROCA, and by harassing and making derogatory statements about ROCA via his personal social media sites including his Twitter account"

Source and Full Legal Action against First Amendment PORN Attorney Marc Randazza aKa scumbag, hypocritical asshole, liar, and lawless.

https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1357796/246279896-roca-labs-randazza-complaint.pdf




Look deep at the Joseph Rakofsky case, the Crystal Cox case, the Roca Labs case and more cases of Randazza Legal Group. There are others that allege these same attorneys and bloggers, media outlets have done this same thing to aid and abet Randazza Legal Group. Do your Homework. It is the same group of attorneys, bloggers, forensics investigators such as Tracy Coenen, every time the same people help Randazza to affect the outcome he wants in legal cases.

Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group use court filings to ruin people’s lives, businesses, defame them, bully them, harass them and teach them a “lesson” or as Marc says “make an enemy of me”.

It is clear to see that Marc Randazza defends the side he is paid to, as do most attorneys. However Marc Randazza takes it to a level of evil, of above the law and he manipulates his power and privilege as an attorney in a legal system that has not caught up with the Internet, in order to win case and seek revenge in such a way that violates our constitutional rights. 


There is plenty of evidence to prove what these folks do, however, I am only one woman and have no resources to fight them. I have done the best I can to the best of my ability. They continue to create more victims, the latest being Roca Labs.


In my opinion, Marc Randazza should have a RICO against him, should be charged with Criminal Defamation among many other illegal and unethical actions he seems to allegedly take against whomever he has a beef with or wants something from.

If you have any questions or wish to represent me against any of these folks in legal action, please eMail me at SavvyBroker@yahoo.com or Crystal@CrystalCox.com


Believe the Lie, or the TRUTH; Suit Yourself. 

They do say Ignorance is Bliss.

No matter what you Believe; the TRUTH will still be the Truth


TELL THE TRUTH; DO THE RIGHT THING; OBEY THE LAW

More Research Links

http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2014/02/crystal-cox-marc-randazza-preliminary.html

http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/search?q=florida

https://www.change.org/p/kimberly-farmer-investigate-pornography-attorney-marc-randazza-of-randazza-legal-group-and-his-affiliation-with-the-libertarian-party-of-nevada-convicted-pedophile-august-kurt-brackob-aka-kurt-treptow

https://web.archive.org/web/20140601093554/http://www.randazzanews.com/

https://www.facebook.com/MarcRandazzaVictimsGroup

Crystal Cox on Marc Randazza's Tactics

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4V3x97VELo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v1xdgv9i_c0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hGQbtTXmp88

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h6Aqnt0_cvs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACe88NLIStk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e35F0CkPjv4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCAXIXA-C0s



More Research Links

http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2014/04/marc-randazza-is-hypocritical-scumbag.html

http://joseph-rakofsky.blogspot.com/2013/06/marc-j-randazza-randazza-legal-group.html

http://crystalcoxmedia.blogspot.com/2014/02/marc-randazza-crystal-cox-war-rages-on.html

http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.com/2012/07/marc-j-randazza-randazza-legal-group.html
↧

Crystal Cox Counterclaims, Declaration of Facts in Randazza vs. Cox District of Nevada.

April 15, 2015, 2:40 pm
$
0
0
Document 254, Randazza v. Cox;

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
2:12-cv-02040-JAD-PAL

CRYSTAL L. COX,
Defendant, Counter Plaintiff

v.
MARC J. RANDAZZA,
Plaintiffs, Counter Defendant

                                                                         Declaration / Statement of Facts / Testimony

On or about December 10th, 2011, one of my Bloggers on my Independent Blog Network, contacted me regarding his contacting an attorney named Marc Randazza. (See Exhibit 18)

I had just lost a major free speech case ( Obsidian Finance Group vs. Cox) and he thought Marc Randazza would be a good fit, and may represent me for Free, as he had just had some TSA case in the media.

I had never heard of attorney Marc Randazza, however, I agreed to have a 3 way phone conversation regarding the possibility of me agreeing to allow Mr. Randazza to represent me, in what had quickly become my high profile First Amendment Case. (see Exhibit 18 to show the initial conversation regarding scheduling a conference call, sending court documents.)

On December 6th, 2011 I had previously spoke to UCLA Law Professor Eugene Volokh. He called me and asked if he could represent me on my Appeal of Obsidian Finance Group v. Crystal Cox and with absolutely no cost to me.

Eugene Volokh is a law professor and does not practice law regularly. So he had to get the final approval of the law firm Mayer Brown LLP. Therefore I had not had firm representation yet from him when I spoke with Marc Randazza. And was open to both or either of them representing me on my Ninth Circuit Appeal, at that time.

On my representation conference call with Marc Randazza, we discussed my strategy for my appeal, as well as my strengths and weaknesses and what I was willing to do and not willing to do.

Randazza told me I had made a mess of the case and he would have to look over all the documentation to decide if he would be able to take my case. Randazza told me that Big Media had a monopoly on Free Speech and that is just the way it is.

Randazza attempted to get me to not appeal, by telling me it was best for all of society if I did not appeal. Randazza asked me my strategy, what I was open to in moving forward, and what I was not. He questioned me on many aspects of my intentions for my appeal.

Randazza told me that he represented the Media Association for Bloggers and may have a conflict of interest in representing me, and that he would get back to me after I gave him all of the documents of my case and he checked with them.


On December 15th, As Exhibit 20 shows, Randazza and Volokh were working with, and keeping Cox in the loop on their representation and the case strategy. They were discussing ordering court documents and had phone calls discussion how to best move forward with my case. They were both representing Cox at that time and in talks about the case with the courts, other attorney and Cox.

Thereafter, it came to my attention that Randazza had contacted attorney David Aman, the opposition in my case, and was negotiating a deal that would stop my appeal and somehow change the status of the judgement .  Eugene Volokh told me this in a phone call and as you see in emails of Dec. 15th, 2011, in Exhibit 1. 



As seen in Exhibit 21, On December 16th 2011 at 9:21 am, I fired Randazza. I told him he does not represent me and that only Eugene Volokh represents me.

Also seen in Exhibit 21,  On December 16th 2011 at 12:55 PM Randazza says he has no issue with me doing that and offers to help me in the future in anyway he can.

Exhibit 21 shows that Marc respect Cox, apologized if I felt not treated well and said that
"People like you are important for the future of citizen journalism, and I wish to see you succeed."

It shows he lied about representation. and admits to trying to broker a deal on Cox's behalf, which is the very definition of "representation.  Exhibit 21 shows Randazza saying, "I did tell the opposing counsel that I thought a deal might be brokered".

Exhibit 21 shows Randazza saying, "Despite the contents of this email, I wish to let you know that I am sill willing to lend a hand in any way - even in the background."

Cox took her former client, who claimed to humbly respect her, apologize, say people like her were need, at his word. Cox truly believed that Randazza was sincere in letting him know if he could help, even in the background. Cox had lost her home, lost her income and needed a job, this was the help she needed. She simply asked Randazza if he knew anyone or would hire Cox for PR work and yet he maliciously, deliberately and knowing the truth painted to the world that Cox had extorted him.  Knowing full well that he did not believe this, he simply want to teach Cox a lesson, intimidate her and ruin her life.

In which he succeeded. He convinced the world Cox was a criminal who had attacked his infant daughter. This ruined Cox's family relationships, business, friendships, ability to rent a home and has left Cox desolate, homeless and unable to rent, to work or to secure clients.
As all exhibits show, Marc Randazza was acting as my attorney. He worked with others in this representation such as Eugene Volokh and the opposition David Aman.

Cox would have kept Randazza on with Volokh had he not lied to her, berated her, presented deals to the opposition without her permission or knowledge of what they were, in her 2.5 million dollar judgment and the appeal.

Randazza retaliated against his former client, and Exhibit 21 proves that he did so with intent, maliciously and after claiming, offering to be of any kind of help.

On January 16th, 2012 Cox emailed Randazza asking for a possible job or job recommendation. On January 17th Randazza emailed Cox back. See Exhibit 17.

Exhibit 17 shows that, though Randazza was upset that Cox registered the domain name he did not believe she had a reasonable or ethical right to own, he did not tell her he believed it was against the law, or extortion in any way.

Randazza is well known for defending the rights of others to have domain names with other people's names in it, such as the Glenn Beck case he was in.

I, Crystal Cox, had also won a WIPO case with the domain names of 3 Proskauer Rose attorneys in them and had one that case, therefore I had no reason to believe it would be an issue.

I, Crystal Cox, assumed he would have no issue with it, as I had read his legal arguments and thought, at the time he was a true proponent of Free Speech rights for all.

Exhibit 17 CLEARLY shows that Counter Defendant Marc Randazza did not have an issue with Cox asking him for a Job.

In fact Exhibit 17 shows clearly, without a doubt that Randazza did not believe he was being extorted, but that in fact, he believed Cox was unreasonable and unethical for registering the domain name, but that she was just asking for a job.

Exhibit 17 proves that Randazza, with full knowledge of it being false, interviewed and flat out lied, made false and defamatory statements to NPR, Forbes, the New York Times, WIPO, the Czech Courts, Tracy Coenen and the Fraud Files, Kenneth White attorney blogger of Popehat.com and numerous other well connected bloggers, and Media around the world.   As well as made these false and defamatory statement in courts and on his own blog. KNOWING full well that it was false.

RANDAZZA gave blogger attorney Kenneth P. White of Popehat.com Cox's personal, priviliged, private email to her former attorney who told her to let him know if he could help her in any way, and he used this email to paint Cox in false light, deliberately not posting the whole email thread which showed that he knew Cox was asking for a job.

Therefore because Cox would not simply turn over a domain name he thought she had no right to own, he went on NPR, interviewed with the New York Times, Forbes, Popehat.com, and he viciously, deliberately, knowing it was false, lied, made false statements to WIPO who used their global clout to ruin the lives of Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox and accuse them worldwide and nationwide, in legal blogs, in big and small media, that Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein ( who never was even in the email) had extorted him, which is a felony crime.

Cox is entitled to relief for the damage Randazza has caused her, though Cox has no attorney or way to articulate this evidence on a legal basis. Cox has valid claims and exhibit 17 further proves this.

Exhibit 17 shows that Randazza was "deeply offended" and that he did not think Cox was reasonable or ethical. However, Randazza clearly never claimed Cox was extorting him, nor did he believe this at the time. Yet later, in retaliation, he deliberately defamed Cox in a widespread, malicious, willful and wanton campaign of revenge, harassment, and widespread posting and speaking false and defamatory statements against Cox to third parties. This ruined Cox's life, quality of life and business. This also put Cox in constant danger, duress and up against massive, widespread hate in big and small media around the world.  And simply for registering a domain name and asking for a job.

Randazza has caused Cox irreparable damage.

Exhibit 17 shows Counter Defendant Marc Randazza Say, "Asking me for a job, or a recommendation?  That doesn't bother me in the least." Yet because Cox did not do as he told her to, he retaliated and ruined her life. And told countless media that he was not only bothered by it but put in terror, stress and extreme duress over it. Which was untrue and Exhibit 17 shows this.

Approx. March 30th, 2012, Counter Defendant Marc Randazza began publishing false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Plaintiff Crystal Cox, attacking a 3 year old online. Defendant Kashmir Hill then interviewed, spoke with Counter Defendant Marc Randazza and published these same  false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Plaintiff Crystal Cox. (Exhibit 6 and Exhibit 8)

On April 2nd 2012, Defendant Kashmir Hill began  publishing false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Plaintiff Crystal Cox, attacking a 3 year old. Plaintiff Crystal Cox had no blog about a 3 year old, made no statements online about this three year old, yet Defendant Kashmir Hill knowingly posted false and defamatory information regarding Counter Plaintiff Cox.  (Exhibit 8)

Jordan Rushie, then of Mulvihill and Rushie LLC now an attorney with Randazza Legal Group, published false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Cox, in an article on Philly Law Blow, by Jordan Rushie, Titled " The Evolution of Crystal Cox: Anatomy of a Scammer", dated, April 3rd 2012.  Jordan Rushie posted false and defamatory statements regarding Cox being guilty of extortion and attacking a three year old.  (Exhibit 7 and 7a, and Exhibit 15)
On April 6th 2012, Bob Garfield interviewed  Counter Defendant Marc Randazza on Defendant wNYC,  New York Public Radio. The show was called “COMBATING "BAD" SPEECH WITH MORE SPEECH”, Dated, April 06, 2012. On the Media, as Exhibits show.  Bob Garfield and Counter Defendant Marc Randazza stated false and defamatory, slanderous statements to a third party concerning Counter Plaintiff Cox. Bob Garfield and Counter Defendant Marc Randazza accused Counter Plaintiff Cox of attacking a child online, of being guilty of extortion, and all manner of unethical and criminal activity. These  false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Counter Plaintiff Cox in this world wide medium of communication has caused Counter Plaintiff Cox immeasurable, irreparable damage.  (Exhibit 4)

On Jun 18th 2012, Counter Defendant Marc Randazza filed a Czech court complaint against Counter Plaintiff Cox and Eliot Bernstein, to initiate a domain name dispute. In this case, Counter Defendant Marc Randazza stated false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Counter Plaintiff Cox.  Counter Defendant Marc Randazza used Kashmir Hill, Jordan Rushie and David Carr’s false and defamatory statements as his evidence to steal the intellectual property of Counter Plaintiff Cox.

Essential using his own interviews with them as purported and believed evidence, though it was false and defamatory statements of fact with willful, wanton, deliberate and malicious intent.

On July 27th 2012, Counter Defendant Marc Randazza filed a WIPO complaint against Counter Plaintiff Cox and Eliot Bernstein, to initiate a domain name dispute. In this case, Counter Defendant Marc Randazza stated false and defamatory statements to a third party concerning Counter Plaintiff Cox.  Counter Defendant Marc Randazza use Kashmir Hill, Jordan Rushie and David Carr’s false and defamatory statements as his evidence to steal the intellectual property of Counter Plaintiff Cox. Counter Defendant Marc Randazza also stated to third party WIPO that Counter Plaintiff Cox was guilty of Extortion and had also extorted him, yet attorney Counter Defendant Marc Randazza had filed no criminal charges against Cox nor allowed her due process of law.  ( Exhibit 2)

As Exhibits 2-8 AND 10-16 show Big and Small Media as well as attorney bloggers, radio shows, international intellectual property law, legal publications, the associated press, small and large bloggers and publishers and more picked up the story or were directly told by Randazza false and defamatory statements and told to post his version of the facts, which, as Exhibits show, were clearly false and defamatory and with full knowledge of the law and their falsehood.

This has been written to the best of my knowledge and truest ability.

Cox seeks all allowable relief, as a matter of law for the damage Randazza has done to her.


Crystal L. Cox, Pro Se
Counter Plaintiff / Defendant

Certification of Service

On April 6 , 2015, Crystal Cox certifies mailing a copy of this to:

U.S. District Court
Clerk of Court
Room 1334
333 Las Vegas Blvd. S.
Las Vegas , NV 89101


Exhibit 18 Links
https://docs.google.com/file/d/1DaGsG-GTl0ct7yeBJBj-7jXm3_EByqwMiF8d6emzbkABfZVtAWmJbuK3AcO9J8qgUpps-mDVjfRnygFq/edit


https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibkxBTzhKWkp3U1k/edit


https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiYksxQlVZM0pJU0U/edit



Exhibit 22
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiU29GUEZTR2ZycnM/edit


EXHIBIT - Randazza is deeply offended but knows Cox was asking for a job and not attempting to extort him.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiY00tM3lidGw0M2M/edit
↧
↧

880 Berkeley St, Boca Raton, FL 33487 is involved in multi-millions in civil legal actions in multiple states.

April 19, 2015, 6:34 am
$
0
0

880 Berkeley St,Boca Raton, FL 33487
More Coming Soon

↧

Simon Bernstein Irrevocable Insurance Trust Dtd 6/21/95 v. Heritage Union Life Insurance Company; Insurance Fraud, Forged Documents, Murder Allegations, No Policy and Millions Paid.

April 20, 2015, 11:19 am
$
0
0
Note:   All Cases on this property INVOLVE property located at 7020 Lions Head Lane Boca Ratonl, Florida, 2494 S Ocean Blvd, Apt C5, Boca Raton, FL 33432, and 880 Berkley St. Boca Raton. These properties are tied up in multi-millions in litigation and they don't want potential buyers to know. Do your homework folks. As a, what seems to be corrupt, lawless or just ignorant Florida Probate Judge is ordering that you, the REAL Estate Buyer NOT be told (DISCLOSED) as to what will inevitably affect your life.

The Ocean Blvd property was SOLD, I believe through a fraudulent residential loan. As it is clearly and investment property and the buyer does not even live in the country. I believe the buyer is friends with Ted Bernstein or associates, and is connected to the lender and others acting in Civil Conspiracy regarding buying this property with little mney down, a low interest residential loan out of Illinois and then profiting tax free acting as if it's a primary resident instead of an investment property.



Meanwhile in Judge Colin's Court in Palm County Florida there is massive crimes and cover up and Judge Martin Colin seems to want to sweep it all under the rug and get it out of the Illinois courts where Justice may be served.

Judge Martin Colin seems to be involved in a Probate Attorney Protection racket, and the victims are children and other innocent citizens. Meanwhile years go by and properties are run down, stolen, sold. .. money disappears, jewelry gone, and so much admitted fraud and forgery AND Judge Martin Colin DOES nothing.

Ted Bernstein pays for an attorney with Estate money and seems to pay for his own life, while other heirs have no attorney, no rights and some are minors. Judge Martin Colin has clearly broken the law and violated constitutional rights and seems to believe he is so connected (probably to Labarga and others from his Prosecutor job) that he will never face prison or any kind of justice. I say he  is wrong and that one day someone will bring Judge Martin Colin to Justice.

Here is the Illinois Docket
http://ia601902.us.archive.org/6/items/gov.uscourts.ilnd.283534/gov.uscourts.ilnd.283534.docket.html

Answer to Complaint
http://ia601902.us.archive.org/6/items/gov.uscourts.ilnd.283534/gov.uscourts.ilnd.283534.17.0.pdf

Heritage Union Life Insurance Company, Jackson National will pay YOU millions and all you have to do is say oh ya my dad had a police for 2 million and the pay with NO Policy, simply to get out of a litigation. WOW?? oh and there is murder allegations and a Heavy Metal Toxin autopsy report. So I guess one can commit murder, then say hey Heritage Union Life Insurance Company, Jackson Life Insurance, I had a policy on that guy, now pay me 2 million and they say ok. Sounds LEGIT.

WOW ... Folks.. WTF comes to mind.

More on the Illinois case


http://www.iviewit.tv/20130506%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20Petition%20Freeze%20Estates%20Orginal%20LOW.pdf


http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/search?q=District+of+Illinois


Why does Judge Martin Colin Protect Tescher and Spallina in CLEAR and Blatant Insurance Fraud, Forgery, and cover ups. And allow them ALL to keep creating victims? There is no policy? Yet millions was paid?? Why is Spallina not investigated by Heritage Life, Jackson National or the the LAW in any Way?

Attorney Robert Spallina, protected by Judge Martin Colin ( in my opinion) tried to colled 2 million in life insurance. The alleged policy holder with NO POLICY, looks to have been murdered. So why is Jackson National Insurance Company NOT investigating this matter?

Here is the Letter Robert Spallina, Florida Probate attorney sent to try and collect the millions.

''Dear Sir or Madam: Enclosed is the Claimant's Statement for the above referenced policy. together with an original Death Certificate for the insured, Simon Bcrnstein, .

We are also enclosing a copy of Internal Revenue Service Form SS-4, Application for Employer Identification Number for the Simon Bernstein Irrevocable Insurance Trust June l. 1995, which is the trust listed as beneficiary of the above referenced policy.

We will provide wiring instructions for the trust bank account when you have processed the claim, if possible, in lieu of a check.  Finally, we are enclosing a copy of the obituary for the decedent which was published in the Palm Beach Post.

We are unable to locate a copy of the original insurance policy.

If you have any questions with regard to the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely

ROBERT L SPALLlNA'' 

Heritage Claim Form, Spallina Alleged Fraud
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkia0RmS3lWaDF6SEU/edit


District of Illinois Federal Case regarding insurance of deceased owner of 7020 Lions Head Lane

Folks do you want to put time, money, blood sweat and tears into making a family home, only to have it taken back by the true heirs once there real is clear and legal title in a way that a dead guy does not sign trust documents.

Buy at your own Risk. Below is a Link to more on the Illinois Case involving this Property ( the Simon Bernstein Estate)

http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2015/04/illinois-master.html




Regency Title dba US Title of Florida and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company seems to be involved in Florida Real Estate probate fraud. As we see that the Shirley Bernstein estate condo was SOLD and they guaranteed a clear title through Greg Gefen Florida attorney who seems to have several title companies.  Regency Title dba US Title of Florida and Old Republic National Title Insurance Company is liable for the millions in property that they allowed the wrong owner to sell.
http://judgemartincolin.blogspot.ie/2015/04/gregory-s-gefen-john-poletto-judge.html


Simon Bernstein Estate Case; Florida Probate Court; Judge Martin Colin; 7020 Lions Head Lane

Click Below for Linked Docket of Simon Bernstein Estate Case
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiS0NMblNaNUk2MXc/edit


7020 Lions Head Lane Boca Raton; Judge Martin Colin has BANNED Real Estate Disclosure.

Judge Martin Colin has banned Eliot Bernstein from DISCLOSING to Real Estate Buyers, as a matter of law, that 7020 Lions Head Lane, Boca Raton Florida is involved in several multi-million dollar legal actions.

When the buyers find out in the future and sue, Eliot Bernstein or his children will be financially liable, he is abiding by the law and blocked by Judge Martin Colin.

Click the Link Below for More
http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2015/04/florida-lis-pendens-7020-lions-head.html



Shirley Bernstein Estate Probate Case connected to the Simon Bernstein Estate Case, both will affect what happens to 7020 Lions Head Lane. Don't Believe Me, do your DUE Diligence, Trust NO One. This is YOUR LIFE.

Click Below for More on the Shirley Bernstein Estate Case, Florida Probate Case in the Court of Judge Martin Colin (ya know the JUDGE who is order NON-Disclosure)

http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2015/04/shirley-bernstein-estate-case-master.html




Sheriff's Report Below
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiNHFZMmhJWjlzdk0/edit




Motion to Remove Ted Bernstein as PR
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiNFdEOWo3ZnhHMEU/edit

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiT0tBZGhKemNzc1E/edit



Florida Probate Attorney Donald Tescher 
(Protected by Judge Martin Colin), 
Excerpt from deposition testimony.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiNDFNWi1sTHBPVzA/edit



The Lasalle National Trust and C/O Robert Spallina Mystery

"Bates #JCK001262, is a letter regarding the filing of a claim dated October 09,
2012, sent from HERITAGE to SPALLINA with SPALLINA addressed as
"LASALLE NATIONAL TRUST N.A. TRUSTEE C/O ROBERT SPALLINA,
ATTORNEY AT LAW" address "4855 TECHNOLOGY WAY STE 720 BOCA
RATON FL 33431" and the Letter starts "Dear Trustee."
http://www.iviewit.tv/Simon%20and%20Shirley%20Estate/20140112%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20PRINTED%20MOTION%20TO%20STRIKE%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20ECFCOPY.pdf

"LaSalle National Trust, N.A." seems to basically be a national holding company, via big title companies and banks and simply a way to convey property, assets, holdings and real estate. Thing is what instrument gave Spallina the right to be the Trustee in the Simon Bernstein estate in this regard?

What was Robert Spallina really up to, using this huge company name and having documents sent to him directly? Or wanting to collect on the Heritage Union Life Insurance Company / Jackson National Life Insurance Company Policy, or lack of policy?

Seems to me that "LaSalle National Trust, N.A.", the real one, has a major claim against Tescher and Spallina unless Robert Spallina was acting with their authority???

"SPALLINA acting as both the TRUSTEE of"LaSalle National Trust, N.A." and as
Trustee of the Lost or Suppressed Trust, HERITAGE would have to legally pay him as either
the Primary or the Contingent Beneficiary in his fraudulent Legal and Fiduciary roles. "
Page 13
http://www.iviewit.tv/Simon%20and%20Shirley%20Estate/20140112%20FINAL%20SIGNED%20PRINTED%20MOTION%20TO%20STRIKE%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20ECFCOPY.pdf
To document search the above page, click on Control F, then type in Lasalle, to read all the places it is mentioned int he above document.


Eliot Bernstein Disclosure; Heritage Union Life Insurance; Jackson National Life Insurance
http://www.iviewit.tv/Simon%20and%20Shirley%20Estate/20131022%20Rule%2026%20Disclosure%20Eliot%20Jackson%20National%20Lawsuit.pdf


Chicago Title Land Trust Company is successor trustee to the listed bank land trustees, as seen here,
http://www.ctlandtrust.com/#!successorships-h-l/ctsk
If Robert Spallina claimed to speak for LaSalle National Trust then is this connect to Chicago Title Company, and perhaps real estate shady dealings involving Greg Geffen in Florida? Hmmm....

Chicago Title is a pretty big deal in Title Insurance. I have owned my own real estate company for 14 years, and well um.. how is Spallina trying to pull off that he is successor trustee or whatever mumbo jumbo he was trying to pull off?

Did Robert Spallina real say he was speaking for Lasalle? really? Employee fund, real estate, SEC, how in the world is Spallina speaking for Lasalle? call me Confused.


More Research

http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2014/02/why-is-heritage-union-life-insurance.html

http://tedbernsteininsurancescam.blogspot.com/2014/01/ted-bernstein-of-life-insurance.html

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/160196536/Ted-Bernstein-Life-Insurance-Concepts-Boca-Raton

http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2014/02/wow-fraud-sure-seems-to-be-piling-up-is.html

http://tedbernsteinreport.blogspot.com/2014/01/robert-spallina-consent-and-joinder-to.html

http://robertspallina.blogspot.com/2014/02/is-adam-simon-liar-liar-pants-on-fire_6.html



Sheriff Report, Spallina
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTThFWTg4S2pIamM/edit

Palm Beach County Sheriff Office Supplemental Report
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiNHFZMmhJWjlzdk0/edit


Heritage Claim Form, Spallina Fraud
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkia0RmS3lWaDF6SEU/edit

Fraud on the Courts, Tescher Spallina and Ted Bernstein
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiRDZGYjVlVnVoQm8/edit


Judge Martin Collin DENIAL Of Emergency Petition to Freeze ASSETS; Now the assets are stolen,sold cheap or just gone.

Judge Martin Colin SHOULD have froze assets until there was clear title, he did NOT.

Here is the DENIAL TO Freeze assets
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiN0RlUWEzM2RWNVU/edit

One of those assests is 7020 Lions Head Lane Boca Raton

Judge Martin Colin never did Freeze assets and it's been near 2 years now. So the assets have illegally been sold off, stole, moved, damaged and ALL because Florida Probate Judge, Judge Martin Colin is protecting Elite Florida Probate attorneys.

Here is the Petition to Freeze Assets
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiTzBGbkdSTXI4MEU/edit



2494 S Ocean Blvd, Apt C5, Boca Raton, FL 33432

More on Litigation involving the above property.

''SPALLINA STATED THAT TED BERNSTEIN IS THE TRUSTEE FOR SHIRLEY' S TRUST .

HE SAID THAT  A CONDO THAT "WAS SOLD FOR $l, 400, 000 AND THAT MONEY

WENT INTO THE TRUST. ''

And lot's more on the supplemental Sheriff's Report Below
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiNHFZMmhJWjlzdk0/edit


Buyer:  Wesley G. Voorheis
333 Bay Street #910
Toronto Ontario, M5h 2R2 Canada

Mortgage
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiQjlmSmRoNXJBdHc/edit

Closer:  Steve Paraggua
Rolling Meadows Illinois

BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Rolling Meadows Illinois

Florida Single Family Fannie Mae / Freddie Mac instrument
Lenders Address is Scottsdale, Arizona

Ok so we have a mortgage broker, banker out of Illinois, a lender out of Arizona, a property in Florida and a buyer in Ontario Canada. And we have a single family residential loan?? REALLY ??

I, Real Estate Expert and advocate Crystal L. Cox say that there is mortgage fraud involved in the sale of the above property, as well as no clear titles, SOLD by someone who had no legal right to sell, has title insurance fraud, RESPA violations and much more.

It says second home, so maybe its legit. But hmm now it's a million more? I say that Broker John Poletto and Ted Bernstein are in on a million dollar scam with the lender and the buyer to dupe the real and true, legal heirs.

What if a buyer knew that they were buying a property from someone who did not have the legal right to sell, and they got a loan like this? Hmm.. all kinds of trouble I'd say.

I know Florida law is different, however, I have never seen a title agent sign on a loan document such as this. Did Title Agent, Florida Attorney Greg Gefen get kickback from this mortgage? On the title insurance? Did Ted Bernstein? Hmm..




Shirley Bernstein Estate Case, Florida Probate Case in the Court of Judge Martin Colin






To research more on the Eliot Bernstein, iViewit RICO

https://www.facebook.com/iviewit/posts/133089426862083

http://federalricolawsuit.blogspot.com/2010/01/judiciary-committee-reviews-iviewit.html

iViewit RICO Crime Chart
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/RICO%20CRIME%20CHARTS.pdf


http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/

http://www.iviewit.tv/


Full RICO Filing

iViewit Supreme Court Case

iViewit SEC Complaint

iViewit Motion to ReHear

↧

Bill Windsor of Lawless America has filmed over 1200 people for the Lawless America Movie. He had us all sign releases for the movie. And yet the State of Montana WISHES to suppress the MOVIE so they flat out LIE over and OVER.

May 29, 2015, 7:46 am
$
0
0
"Montana authorities claim there is no credible evidence that Bill Windsor has been filming a movie

Montana authorities claim there is no credible evidence that Bill Windsor has been filming a movie.
Now how utterly ridiculous is this!  But by claiming this, it gives them an excuse to say that the filming was actually stalking.
 Bill Windsor contacted the Montana Film Commission to register.

 He was approved for filming by the University of Montana. 

He kept the University of Montana Police informed about his filming plans.  And he was approved by the City of Missoula to film anywhere in the city on public property.  There had been at least a dozen articles published about the filming planned, and letters were sent to the University.
Bill Windsor filmed over 750 people from every state.  There are 1,200 videos on the Lawless America Channel on YouTube.
There are literally hundreds of articles online about the movie:
The home page of LawlessAmerica.com lists links to detailed information about the movie:
Proposed Legislation — Word File — PDF File

Source
http://universityofmontanaemployee.com/?p=772
↧
Search

State of Montana v. William Michael Windsor; More Cover Ups for the Culture of Corruption and Rape in the State of Montana

May 29, 2015, 8:01 am
$
0
0
Detective Chris Shermer, Judge James Haynes, Missoula Police Department, University of Montana, Missoula County Attorney Kirsten Pabst and more, State of Montana flat out ignores Free Speech Rights, IGNORES the First Amendment, IGNORES Shield Laws and Jails a Reporter who really was reporting on the corruption in the State of MONTANA, especially the Missoula COunty Corruption that protects the University of Montana to violate the Civil Rights of VICTIMS of REAL CRIMES.



"State of Montana v. William Michael Windsor - Docket in Trial to try to stop Lawless America...The Movie

On October 3, 2014, the State of Montana filed five criminal charges against William Michael Windsor for sending a Tweet, sending an email to an attorney, and publishing the words "Sean Boushie" online four times in two legal documents.
For these imaginary crimes, the State of Montana wants 66-year-old Bill Windsor to spend seven years in the Montana State Prison.
Here is the Docket with the filings in the case...
 State of Montana v. William Michael Windsor - Docket

Source
↧
↧

Detective Chris Shermer: "Bill Windsor files new criminal charges against Sean Boushie" with the Missoula Police Department.

May 29, 2015, 9:24 am
$
0
0
Can Detective Christ Shermer REALLY do some Deep Detective Work? 

"On May 27, 2015, William M. Windsor filed 22 criminal charges against Sean Boushie with the Missoula Police Department and the Missoula County Attorney's Office.
We shall now see if these folks are the wonderful law-abiding civil servants who I hope they are...
The letter below is a matter of public record:
Ms. Jennifer Clark, Master Tyler Dugger, and Detective Chris Shermer:
I request a meeting with Detective Chris Shermer to present my criminal charges against Sean Boushie for false swearing, perjury, and false statements to the police.
I have detailed 22 counts.
 
I respectfully submit that there are many ways for you to determine that Sean Boushie is a criminal.  But, for starters, please subpoena the following:
 
Google:  All information about the user of the following email addresses/accounts, including name, contact information, and IP addresses:
 
seanmboushie.blogspot.com
 
Yahoo: All information about the user of the following email addresses, including name, contact information, and IP addresses:
 
 
Verizon: Subpoena all information about Sean Boushie's cell phone.  Most of the emails were sent from a Blackberry using Verizon.  Boushie has a Blackberry.  If they by any chance have records of his emails, bingo.  Maybe they at least can say that Verizon would have picked up the IP addresses that were repeatedly used in Boushie's emails.  Neither Crystal Cox nor I have had a Blackberry, and we weren't in this area.
 
Verizon: Subpoena all information for my number, 770-578-1094.  If they still have records of calls for 2012 and 2013, they will show that I never called Boushie.
 
University of Montana: Obtain information for these University of Montana IP addresses that Crystal Cox and I have captured on emails from Sean Boushie: 150.131.72.190 (2-27-2010 at 3:15 pm); 150.131.65.113 (9-13-2012 at 9:03 am and again at 12:38 pm and again at 1:34 pm); 150.131.64.81 (1-17-2013 at 2:24 pm); 150.131.76.3 (2-15-13).  Confirm with your IT gurus that there is no way to send an email from a University of Montana computer without being at the University of Montana.  Neither Crystal Cox nor I were ever there.
 
Call (my ex-wife) at 404-###-#### and confirm that I did not have a gun in Montana in August 2013 because it was in her home from April 2013 until December 6, 2013. 
 
Obtain registration information for www.victimsclassactiongroup.com.  This was a website operated by Sean Boushie to attack Crystal Cox.
 
Subpoena information for Sean Boushie's home telephone number that he claims he disconnected because of all the calls I made to him.  What was the number?  When was it disconnected?  What was the telephone company told?  Where are there 911 calls or other reports of this alleged activity?
 
Request information from Sean Boushie:  Ask Sean Boushie for evidence of the unsuspecting people that I emailed accusing them of harassment or crimes.  Ask Sean Boushie for evidence of any frivolous legal action I ever filed with attempts to obtain legal settlements.  Ask for evidence of the requests for legal settlements.  Ask Sean Boushie for evidence that I took over Crystal Cox's list of victims and that I was hired to harass them.
 
Do a forensic examination of my laptop.  Confirm that I never faked any emails, etc.
 
Review my polygraph examination results.  This will confirm that I never knowingly or purposely did anything to violate a protective order.  I never had a gun in Montana.  I never did anything pretending to be Sean Boushie. 
 
You have me charged with five crimes, all of which were set up by the criminal acts of Sean Boushie.  Unless some higher powers have told you to pursue these actions against me, you have a duty to confirm that Sean Boushie is the criminal.  And, his crimes are much more serious than what you have charged me with.  So, go arrest him.
 
Detective Shermer, please let me know when I can come meet with you, obtain a police report number, etc.  Thank you.
 
Bill Windsor"

Source
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1627:bill-windsor-files-new-criminal-charges-against-sean-boushie&catid=1:latest-news
↧

Did Missoula County Attorney Kirsten Pabst Really represent a rapist? Why Does the Missoula Police and the Missoula County Attorney PROTECT Rapists, Stalkers, and Abusers and JAIL those who REPORT on Montana Corruption and GIVE voice to VICTIMS?

May 29, 2015, 10:23 am
$
0
0
"NOTE: The woman who left the Missoula County prosecutor’s office to defend the star quarterback on rape charges is now THE Missoula County “District” Attorney, Kirsten Pabst.  Kirsten Pabst has authorized the outlandish criminal charges against Bill Windsor for Tweeting and Emailing, all done in protection of the man who attempted to murder Bill, Sean Boushie." Source of Above and More.
http://universityofmontanaemployee.com/?p=470

Bill Windsor went to JAIL in Montana to cover up the FACT that the State of Montana, the University of Montana, Flathead County, Ravalli County, Lincoln County, the Missoula Police Department, Hamilton Police, the Montana Attorney General, the Montana Governor's office, Montana ACLU and many more KNEW about massive rapes that were widespread in Montana, were an epidemic and involved cops either directly or in cover up.

I, Crystal Cox, was part of a Sheriff Recall in Lincoln County Montana. This recall LOUDLY let every Montana Agency Know that there was a massive issue with rape in Montana and that law enforcement was doing NOTHING to protect victims or prosecute rapists.

Montana Law Enforcment, Judges, ACLU, the Attorney General, the Governor; they ALL knew about the issue of rape victims in the State of Montana who were being treated unjust in the legal system in multiple counties. YET they ALL did nothing.  And instead tried to silence bloggers.

I reported on the Lincoln County Recall, the Rapes, the Rapists and the cops that covered up for these horrible crimes and had been for decades. Their answer was to threaten me, stalk me, harass me, intimidate and bully me.

When local cops would try and give voice to victims, they were run out by the proverbial Good ol' Boys, and the victims had no voice.

Sean Boushie of the University of Montana threatened to KILL ME, and taunted me for years, ruining my life and business and all these Montana agencies knew and enabled him to do so.

I had been told of around 40 rapes in that year alone, and when I spoke out, the law enforcement treated me as the criminal.  I had read reports, saw rape kids, saw evidence, interviewed rape advocates, victims and families. And I was targeted for speaking out about the RAPES.

Judge James Haynes in Hamilton Montana REFUSED me a Protective Order against the man who threatened to kill me and had waged an online war to ruin my life, my business and constantly harass me, all the while seeking other haters to join him.  This was clearly a hate crime and was IGNORED by all Montana Law Enforcement and Judges.

A few weeks after Judge Haynes DENIED me protection, Judge Robin Clute of Hamilton Montana gave Sean Boushie, the man who threatened to kill me, a protective order against ME, in which stopped the flow of information, chilled speech and violated my First Amendment Rights and my Civil Rights.

This protective order was NOT mutual and therefore I was not allowed as a matter of law, or be jailed, to speak of the University of Montana or of Sean Boushie.

So I stopped my reporting for well over a year and yet he kept attacking me, gathering haters, targeting my clients and business, harassing me, interfering with my federal legal cases, emailing every person I reported on or did online marketing for and constantly attacked me and ALL on paid time by the University of Montana and enabled by Montana Law Enforcement and Judges, all while he had a protective order against ME.

Via Federal Law and the Constitution of the United States of America, it is CLEAR that the State of Montana, the Missoula County Attorney, the University of Montana, the Missoula Police Department, Detective Chris Shermer, Montana Judges such as Judge Robin Clute, Judge Karen Townsend and Judge James Haynes VIOLATED the First Amendment Rights of Bill Windsor, of me, Crystal Cox and of Michael Spreadbury, and all by the use of an unconstitutional protective order used to chill speech and violate our constitutional and civil rights.

In the "Real World" outside of Montana Corruption, there is massive discussion and higher court rulings in which protect the civil rights, human rights, free speech and first amendment rights of bloggers such as Crystal Cox, Micheal Spreadbury and Bill Windsor.

Yet the State of Montana, Montana Judges and Law Enforcement ABUSE protective orders and use them to silence reporters, jail bloggers, and to flat out STOP the flow of information, chill speech, suppress information and to cover up for local judges, cops, county attorneys, cops and the rogue law enforcement at the University of Montana.

Montana seems to be acting as it’s own country, completely outside of the U.S Constitution. And with total disregard of Civil Rights, the Bill of Rights, Due Process Laws and the Constitutional Rights of those who they target.

The Lincoln County Sheriff Recall of 2009, is Flat out, undeniable PROOF that ALL Montana Agencies at the HIGHEST Level, knew about the issue of widespread rape in the State of Montana and that victims were suffering not only from RAPE but from how Law Enforcement, Cops, Detectives, Sheriff's, Judges and County Attorneys across Montana were handling their rape kits, investigations, interviews, evidence and investigation as a whole.

The Lincoln County Recall attempt of Sheriff Daryl Anderson due to massive unprosecuted rapes is the Root of Why the Missoula County Attorney, Missoula Police Department, Ravalli County, Hamilton Police, Missoula and Hamilton Judges and the University of Montana, have RETALIATED against reporter, whistle blower, film producer, anti-corruption blogger Bill Windsor. 

Bill Windsor interviewed and filmed me, Crystal Cox, for his movie, Lawless America. After this he was targeted by the man who threatened to kill me and he was DENIED protection, civil rights and constitutional rights by ALL the same Montana Law Enforcement Agencies involved in Whistle Blower Retaliation against me.  And he received the same unconstitutional, unethical treatment from the University of Montana, Montana Police, Montana County Attorneys and Montana Judges as did I, Crystal Cox and Michael Spreadbury whom had been reporting on Montana Corruption for many years prior.

Michael Spreadbury and I, Crystal Cox, told Montana Cops, Judges, Investigators, County Attorneys, Newspapers, the Attorney General, Judges and more about what cops were doing to the citizens of Montana and we were RETALIATED against in the the EXTREME.  

Bill (William) Windsor of Lawless America reported on our story, essentially a reporter reporting on reporters and he then faced Extreme Whistle Blower Retaliation himself, and with MASSIVE documented proof of what happened to him, he was and is painted out as the abuser when he is CLEARLY the VICTIM, as a matter of LAW and with MASSIVE undeniable evidence.

The Historic Recall Efforts of the Lincoln County Recall Committee of 2009 in effort to DEMAND accountability from police, judges, the sheriff, detectives and county attorneys regarding the issue of widespread failure to prosecute or competently investigate RAPES is what brought Bill Windsor of Lawless America to Montana, that is the TRUTH, the whole TRUTH and nothing but the TRUTH.



The Widespread Cover up of RAPE and the Culture of Corruption in Montana is what led to Michael Spreadbury and Crystal Cox reporting on what was happening in their town. This is what drew the eye of anti-corruption blogger, whistle blower, and film producer Bill Windsor.  And what ultimately got Bill Windsor JAILED in the State of Montana.

To Research More on the Historic attempt to Recall Sheriff Anderson in Lincoln County Montana due to an overwhelming number of RAPES that were NOT taken serious, investigated or prosecuted AND the fact that the rapists were repeatedly protected by law enforcement, the county attorney and judges; see links below

Great Overview with Many Links
http://ballotpedia.org/Daryl_Anderson_recall,_Lincoln_County,_Montana,_2009



Local Article on One of the Rapes that was highly publicized

Click on Photo Above to Enlarge


Media at the Time about the Recall

http://billingsgazette.com/news/state-and-regional/montana/lincoln-county-sheriff-recall-petition-circulating/article_db2ac996-6cbb-11de-a377-001cc4c002e0.html


http://missoulian.com/news/local/lincoln-county-group-seeks-to-recall-sheriff/article_9ad9496a-042b-5269-92e8-d64f9ecfbaf8.html

http://www.dailyinterlake.com/members/citizens-want-to-recall-lincoln-county-sheriff/article_87e745c7-667d-5cd7-8ecc-b722dd20fcf6.html

http://www.libbymt.com/news/2009/07/Recallallegationsvag.htm


Media around the Rejection of the Petition

http://www.libbymt.com/news/2009/06/Requestforpetitionto.htm

http://flatheadbeacon.com/2009/07/05/lincoln-county-rejects-petitions-to-recall-sheriff/

http://helenair.com/news/state-and-regional/leaders-of-sheriff-recall-petition-vow-to-try-again/article_3c9801a8-a247-525b-82eb-f97144fefcb8.html

http://www.thewesternnews.com/members/group-hopes-to-erase-political-religious-lines/article_6692d779-3991-5e3b-b5ae-a747e3f70904.html



Local Media on Recall Efforts Failing

http://flatheadbeacon.com/2009/10/09/lincoln-county-sheriff-recall-effort-fails/


Video I Did around the time about the Recall Efforts
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSUBx-LDGuk


Video Playlist of How I became an Investigative Blogger (December 2009)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v5ZkXBQJ-oM&list=PL8020348DB0F9064B


Below is the Letter to the Editor Sean Boushie Posted in which he interjected himself, willingly, into this highly public, heated, controversial debate.


I, Crystal Cox, rebutted this letter to the editor and that was the very beginning of Sean Boushie's harassment, defamation, bullying, intimidating, hate crime, retaliation campaign against me and anyone who reported on my story.
↧

Missoula County Attorney Jennifer Clark, Detective Chris Shermer and the Missoula Police seem to not care at all about the Civil Rights or Human Rights of Bill Windsor; No Surprise to me.

June 1, 2015, 5:56 am
$
0
0
"Lawless America Website down May 31, 2015 following an attack on the Internet Service Provider

Bill Windsor reports that the Lawless America Website was down all day May 31, 2015 following an attack on the site's Internet Service Provider in Iceland.

Rumor has it that it was either ISIS or the Joeyisalittlekid Gang...

I hope it wasn't an attack directed at us, though we have experienced this before.  It is interesting that this was coupled with some type of problem with my email.

I spent my weekend working on filings for the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco, Texas.  Among other things, the court is claiming that it did not receive several filings that I mailed from jails.

Still can't fully shake being sick.  Queazy stomach, headache, and dizziness remain constants.  I need to find a local doctor to get a second opinion on my earthquake-like hand tremors.  In Idaho, I was told it is just claustrophobia-induced.  I still shake as badly as I did in maximum security.  It's probably just stress-induced, but it is very pronounced.

Waiting to hear the new trial date here in Missoula Montana.  Plans to be made once I know how much time there is to prepare for trial.  If the trial isn't until September, I will have breathing room so I can leave here for a bit to visit some friends and try to get a little R&R.

Missoula County Attorney Jennifer Clark is to advise me this week as to when I get to interview the witnesses against me.  I look forward to learning how they can prove that I sent a Tweet, an email to an attorney, or published two articles online.  And I really look forward to exploring the non-existent police investigation into these dastardly crimes.

Responses to my Freedom of Information requests are what I most look forward to.

Some people have been critical of me for writing about what's happening with me.  I NEED some volunteers who will publish on LawlessAmerica.com.  I've asked and conducted training sessions in the past, but folks never panned out.  If you would like to be an editor here, please email me at windsorinmontana@yahoo.com.  I can also use an editor for the Facebook Page.  I'd love to get something set up now so that should I end up in prison, we can continue getting content out online.  And if a few folks want to form a committee to handle completion of the film if I am sent to The Big House, this is also very important."

Source
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1637:lawless-america-website-down-may-31-2015-following-an-attack-on-the-internet-service-provider&catid=1:latest-news

↧

Montana County Attorneys and Montana Law Enforcement REFUSE to INVESTIGATE and thereby refuse to KNOW THE TRUTH. This is Fraud on the Courts, fraud against victims, and a violation of Civil and Constitutional Rights.

June 1, 2015, 6:26 am
$
0
0
Bill Windsor Said,  " It seems to me that they don't want to know the truth because that complicates their corrupt mission.  I hate to be so cynical, but nothing that has ever been done to me in Montana makes sense.  It has been dishonesty and corruption from the word GO."

Yes Bill Windsor, EXACTLY. 

It was the same thing with me and many I reported on. The Montana Detectives did not want to know. It was a 2 minute job to subpoena Google, Yahoo, and many others involved. I already had the information ready to go and the POLICE, the INVESTIGATORS refused to investigate, essentially refusing to know the TRUTH. Many of them said over and over, well, there is no way really to know. Yet it was EASY to prove yahoo, google, craigslist and many other sites, where the IP came from, who had posted the hate, where the death threats came from and they REFUSED.

The University of Montana is LIABLE for what has happened to Bill Windsor and to Crystal Cox, as well as countless other victims of Montana corruption and total lack of investigation.

Here is a chronology of what Sean Boushie, the University of Montana and Montana Authorities did to me, Crystal Cox. And they refuse to investigate any of it and therefore created a large of amount of victims who lost their business, could not sell property, faced extreme hate and they made me, my life, my business the collateral damage of their corruption adn refusal to investigate.

Below is Bill Windsor's chronology of what Sean Boushie did to him, and YET none of it was investigated and to the point of claiming he was the abuser, jailing him, putting his health in harm, and putting him under massive duress, in total violation of his Human Rights, Civil Rights and Constitutional Rights.

Here is a list of where Bill Windsor reached out to Montana authorities over and over again to get help, and they did nothing

Here is more of Bill's documentation on all this


So now we are at NOW, and Still NOTHING is being Done by the Missoula Police. It is EASY for the DOJ to see why rapes are NOT investigated in Montana. The Police and the University of Montana superpowers protect the rapists, their families, sports teams and the proverbial "bad guy".

"Bill Windsor volunteered to let Missoula Police Department conduct a forensic examination of his laptop to prove the truth in Montana

Bill Windsor volunteered to let Missoula Police Department conduct a forensic examination of his laptop to prove the truth in Montana.

The excuse the police use in regard to the massive cyberstalking of Sean Boushie is that Bill Windsor could have written those emails to himself.  So, check the computer; all of the emails are there.

Gee, why wouldn't they take William M. Windsor's generous offer ...

It makes you wonder.  It seems to me that they don't want to know the truth because that complicates their corrupt mission.

I hate to be so cynical, but nothing that has ever been done to me in Montana makes sense.  It has been dishonesty and corruption from the word GO.

If I was the prosecuting attorney and my interest is justice, I'd jump all over an offer of a free no-holds-barred inspection of a hard drive.

Bill Windsor's criminal complaint against Sean Boushie is now in the hands of the Missoula Police Department and the Missoula County Attorney's Office.  

So, the clock is ticking on whether they investigate.  If they investigate, they'll have firmly established that Sean Boushie is a criminal.  If they don't investigate, they will firmly establish that corruption is behind what is being done to me.

More information and comments are available on Bill Windsor's Facebook Page.

Bill Windsor has scheduled TalkShoe Show for Tuesday, June 2, 2015 at 7:00 PM Central Time.  Please plan to join us.

Lawless America.  That's where we live.

Bill Windsor set out to film a movie exposing government, judicial, and law enforcement corruption.  He traveled to every state (except Alaska), and he filmed over 750 stories of corruption and has thousands more who wanted to be filmed.  Evil people, some working for various government entities and committing crimes, set out to destroy Bill Windsor and the movie, Lawless America.  Bill Windsor has been defamed online in the largest case of defamation in U.S. history.  His life has been threatened many times.

A UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE, Sean Boushie, attempted to murder Bill Windsor.   Sean Boushie then falsely claimed that Bill stalked him, threatened him with a gun, and a host of other lies.  Corrupt courts gave Sean Boushie a Temporary Order of Protection.  It expired on September 16, 2013, but corrupt Montana and Texas folks pretended it still existed, and a bench warrant was issued for unsuspecting Bill.

Bill Windsor was put into the Ellis County Texas Jail illegally for 53 days as a political prisoner -- held for extradition.  William M. Windsor was then unlawfully held in the Ada County Idaho Jail for 35 days and then illegally handed over to two Missoula County Montana Sheriff's Deputies on March 25, 2015.  He was held there for 46 days (a grand total of 134 days behind bars). He escaped (on bond) at 11:30 am on May 9, 2015.

The State of Montana has filed five criminal charges against William M. Windsor for sending a Tweet, publishing the UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA EMPLOYEE's name (the would-be killer Sean Boushie) four times, sending a legal notice email to a University of Montana attorney, and filming the movie and the pilot for a TV show that will expose Montana as the most corrupt state in the country.  “Law enforcement” had LawlessAmerica.com removed from the Internet.  This website contains over 1,400 articles exposing corruption.  Bill Windsor worked with a friendly offshore hosting company to return the website to the Internet outside the clutches of American evildoers.  He wasn't so lucky when Facebook removed the movie page falsely claiming it promoted nudity, pornography, and solicitation of sex ... or when AT&T canceled the email that he used on everything related to the movie for years falsely claiming he violated their Terms of Service."

Source
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1636:bill-windsor-volunteered-to-let-missoula-police-department-conduct-a-forensic-examination-of-his-laptop-to-prove-the-truth-in-montana&catid=1:latest-news



"Bill Windsor volunteered for a Polygraph to prove the truth in Montana

Bill Windsor volunteered for a polygraph examination to prove the truth in Montana.

In fact, he volunteered for more than that.  Bill Windsor told the Missoula Police Department and the Missoula County Prosecuting Attorney to hook him to a polygraph to see that he has never said anything but the truth.

Gee, why wouldn't they take William M. Windsor's generous offer ...

It makes you wonder.  It seems to me that they don't want to know the truth because that complicates their corrupt mission.

I hate to be so cynical, but nothing that has ever been done to me in Montana makes sense.  It has been dishonesty and corruption from the word GO.

If I was the prosecuting attorney and my interest is justice, I'd jump all over an offer of a polygraph test.

Bill Windsor's criminal complaint against Sean Boushie is now in the hands of the Missoula Police Department and the Missoula County Attorney's Office.  So, the clock is ticking on whether they investigate.  If they investigate, they'll have firmly established that Sean Boushie is a criminal.  If they don't investigate, they will firmly establish that corruption is behind what is being done to me.

More information and comments are available on Bill Windsor's Facebook Page."

Source
http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1635:bill-windsor-volunteered-for-a-polygraph-to-prove-the-truth-in-montana&catid=1:latest-news

↧
↧

Nevada Attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group SLAPPED down again for ignorance and arrogance. Or is it for being too damn dumb to get this whole SLAPP law and appeals process?

June 4, 2015, 7:47 am
$
0
0
Ok so world's most hypocritical, unconstitutional, civil rights violating attorney, Marc Randazza Fucks up his SLAPP appeal to the Ninth Circuit by ummm .. hmm well let's just poke some fun and say it is for being to damn dumb, oh in my humble opinion.

Check this shit out

"A review of the file in this case reveals that counsel has failed to perfect the appeal as prescribed by the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to the order of this court dated April 10, 2015. Counsel for appellant is directed to notify immediately his/her client in writing regarding this dismissal.

This order served on the district court shall constitute the mandate of this court."

Source of Marc Randazza Fopa
http://ia601205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.273.0.pdf

FULL Crazy Hypocritical Docket
http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.docket.html

Also Check out my Nevada Bar Complaint against Marc Randazza, Nevada Attorney
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZxTmp7zZ7HcNaOXXZYoNyTaEH9uuh0bPUUuzMgSQ8uk/edit

↧

Attorney Marc Randazza did not believe that Crystal Cox had extorted him, yet he set out on a world wide, defamatory, malicious hate campaign against blogger Crystal Cox. And ALL THIS after he was her attorney and owed her duties as such.

June 4, 2015, 8:11 am
↧
Search

Declaration of Facts, Filed by Crystal Cox in the Randazza v. Cox Case

June 4, 2015, 8:16 am
↧

Exhibit 21 shows that Marc respect Cox, apologized if I felt not treated well and said that "People like you are important for the future of citizen journalism, and I wish to see you succeed."; Does Marc Randazza not owe his clients duty, obligations and to NOT violate their civil and constitutional rights?

June 4, 2015, 8:40 am
$
0
0
Marc Randazza, apologized to me, Crystal Cox and said that people like me were important.  Marc Randazza claimed to want to see me succeed. Then he launched a massive online hate and defamation campaign against me, ruined my life, family connections, business, and quality of life. Exhibit 21 shows more on this, Click Below
http://ia701205.us.archive.org/2/items/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330/gov.uscourts.nvd.91330.257.0.pdf

Email
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkibFhleXdsZ2FBbTQ/edit

"Exhibit 21 shows that Marc respect Cox, apologized if I felt not treated well and said that
"People like you are important for the future of citizen journalism, and I wish to see you succeed."

It shows he lied about representation. and admits to trying to broker a deal on Cox's behalf, which is the very definition of "representation.  Exhibit 21 shows Randazza saying, "I did tell the opposing counsel that I thought a deal might be brokered".

Exhibit 21 shows Randazza saying, "Despite the contents of this email, I wish to let you know that I am sill willing to lend a hand in any way - even in the background."

Cox took her former client, who claimed to humbly respect her, apologize, say people like her were need, at his word. Cox truly believed that Randazza was sincere in letting him know if he could help, even in the background. Cox had lost her home to foreclosure, lost her income and needed a job, this was the help she needed. She simply asked Randazza if he knew anyone or would hire Cox for PR work and yet he maliciously, deliberately and knowing the truth painted to the world that Cox had extorted him.  Knowing full well that he did not believe this, he simply want to teach Cox a lesson, intimidate her and ruin her life.

In which he succeeded. He convinced the world Cox was a criminal who had attacked his infant daughter. This ruined Cox's family relationships, business, friendships, ability to rent a home and has left Cox desolate, homeless and unable to rent, to work or to secure clients.

As all exhibits show, Marc Randazza was acting as my attorney. He worked with others in this representation such as Eugene Volokh and the opposition David Aman.

Cox would have kept Randazza on with Volokh had he not lied to her, berated her, presented deals to the opposition without her permission or knowledge of what they were, in her, then, 2.5 million dollar judgment.

Randazza retaliated against his former client, and Exhibit 21 proves that he did so with intent, maliciously and after claiming, offering to be of any kind of help.

Cox moves this court to include Exhibit 21 as evidence against Marc Randazza in her counterclaim.

Crystal L. Cox, Pro Se
Counter Plaintiff / Defendant"

↧
↧

Marc Randazza FLAT out lied to the courts and the world about his representation or shall I say mis-representation and defamation against his former client Crystal Cox, me.

June 4, 2015, 9:06 am
↧

Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group SPREAD Malicious Lies about his Former Client Crystal Cox He did so as an officer of the court and with full knowledge that what he was stating was FALSE.

June 4, 2015, 9:40 am
↧

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report Removed Rip Off Report speaking critical of First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza and his law firm Randazza Legal Group.

June 7, 2015, 9:54 am
$
0
0
The First Amendment is Alive and Well; accept when it comes to those who speak critical of First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza or his law firm Randazza Legal Group.

I, Crystal Cox posted a Rip Off Report about Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group in January of 2014.  Marc Randazza was, at that time, involved in a case where he was supporting / representing Opinion Corporation and their online gripe site PissedConsumer.com. Marc Randazza, as usual, was boldly out there pretending to protect the First Amendment Rights of all to post on that site.



After I posted my Rip Off Report griping about / reviewing my former attorney Marc Randazza and his law firm Randazza Legal Group, the owner of Rip Off Report, Ed Magedson, emailed me and asked me to call him to discuss it. I called Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report, and I confirmed it was me, it was my story and he let the post go up; that was January of 2014.

The Randazza Legal Groupies, as I like to call the gang of attorneys and bloggers that side with First Amendment attorney Marc Randazza no matter if he is ethical or legal, constitutional or unconstitutional, well they "act" as if Free Speech on the Internet is the most important thing.

They "act" as if they are for "ALL speech" and not some speech. They say ya gotta love all speech and they tout their First Amendment Rights as a badge of honor in which they will do anything to protect.

Yet they have never been for the free speech rights of Blogger Crystal Cox, Inventor Eliot Bernstein, Whistle blower Alexandra Mayers or Human Trafficking Victim / Investigative Blogger Diana Grandmason. In fact, they have sued us, threatened us, had us followed, bullied us and put us on under massive duress and attack for years. And all because they did not like our FREE SPEECH.

The Randazza Legal Groupies do not speak up when their lying leader, Marc Randazza, uses Trademark Law, Copyrights, the Lanham Act, Defamation Laws, and more, to silence his critics. They simply put their head in the sand and ignore what Marc Randazza is CLEARLY doing to HURT the Free Speech RIGHTS of all on the internet.


Still today you see the Randazza Legal Groupies paint me, Crystal Cox, out to be a criminal, a felony extortionist, an infant attacker and more. Yet the truth continues to reign free to anyone who actually reads into the documents facts of any of it.

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report charges around $2500 to start, Right? In order to arbitrate between the person who feels their were a victim and the person or company they post on.

Here is more on the Corporate Advocacy Program at Rip Off Report (not to be confused with EXTORTION of course)
http://www.ripoffreport.com/CorporateAdvocacyProgram/Change-Report-From-Negative-To-Positive.aspx

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report makes ALOT of money. I, Crystal Cox, am currently penniless and homeless due to the Randazza Legal Groupies. Yet Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report is not an extortionist in any way right? And the Randazza Legal Groupies claim that Crystal Cox is? WOW.



Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report is somewhat infamous for never taking down posts. We, as consumers, who have made amends with those we griped about do not have the right to edit or retract our own posts / Rip Off Reports.

Innocent people, companies, churches, pastors, lawyers, and more really are harmed every day by false Rip Off Reports, malicious Rip Off Reports. Yet they, we, are "not allowed" to edit or remove, even our own post, no matter how much they / we plead with Ed Magedson or provide proof of what is said being clearly false and defamatory.

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report claims to never remove anything and to be for the First Amendment Rights of all. Yet he took, flat out hijacked, my, top of the search engine Rip Off Report speaking critical of Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group and used it to harass and defame me, and claimed I abused the site.

Instead of deleting the post / Rip Off Report I posted, or allowing me to retract or edit it, Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report simply hijacked my report to suit his own agenda. And used it AGAINST ME, the original poster. This was in complete discrimination and NOT a standard of practice of the Rip Off Report.

Sidenote:  Anyone with balls enough to SUE Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report and wants to represent me Pro Bone, email me at ReverendCrystalCox@Gmail.com

So, the question becomes why?

Well to me it is clear that Marc Randazza, Ken White, and the Randazza Legal Groupies threatened Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report somehow. Was it a lawsuit against him? Do they have something on him? Would they start an online war and harassment campaign against him as they did me? What threat did they make? And why did / does Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report not report them to the Bar, to the Attorney General, the Department of Justice?

Does Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report fear that the Randazza Legal Groupies will harm him in some way? If so How? Who got to Ed? Well I would say Marc Randazza and I would say it is illegal, unconstitutional and clearly unethical.

Marc Randazza did not only try and silence a critic, suppress speech, shut down the flow of information and use copyright and trademark law to shut down sites that spoke critical of him, but he succeeded. Marc Randazza consistently shuts my blogs down, has my Rip Off Report Changed, gets my YouTube Videos and Facebook pages shut down, and yet is still speaking out as if he is FOR the Free Speech Rights of ALL. Which CLEARLY he is NOT.


Below is a part of a Timeline I have included in my Nevada Bar Complaint and Attorney General Complaint Filing that is Pending. This shows dates and actions of Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report in regard to my Rip Off Report griping about / reviewing my former attorney Marc Randazza and his law firm Randazza Legal Group. Which I claim is aiding and abetting, and clear proof of pattern and history and will be part of a RICO Legal Action at some point. (Stay Tuned)

Chronology of Events

On January 3rd 2014, I, Crystal Cox posted a Rip Off Report regarding my experience with Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group.

I got this eMail right away

''
Real Name:
Crystal Cox
Display Name:
CrystalCox
Email:
savvybroker@yahoo.com


Dear Crystal,

Did you make this posting? if so, can you give us a call?

NO, we were not even contacted by the attorney. We are contacting you because we think the posting might be suspicious. We don’t know him  nor have we ever spoken with him at our office.

You can respond to me by email and or ..
You can call me directly at xxx and say who you are..
If it goes into voicemail, just try back in 5 minutes.

Let me know you are the one that posted the Report to the 1st Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza and that you stand by your Report.

This is the Report I am referring to.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/Marc-Randazza-of-Randazza-Legal-Group/Las-Vegas-Nevada-89135/Marc-Randazza-of-Randazza-Legal-Group-Marc-Randazza-of-Randazza-Legal-Group-Marc-Randazz-1112488


ED Magedson - Founder
EDitor@RipoffReport.com
www.ripoffreport.com ''

I immediately called and stated that it was my report and that I fully stand by what I said.

Ed Magedson is well known for NOT removing Rip Off Reports, he offers a service costing thousands for people to negotiate the removal of a report. He has been to court many times allegedly and has stood by the NOT removing anything policy.  The Rip Off Reports are consistent and when someone files, their initial grievance remains on top and their title to the report remains the same.

After we hung up, Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report, went ahead and filed the Report.


Approximately February 1, 2014,  Kenneth P. White of Popehat.com and the law firm White, Brown and Newhouse of California, associate and friend of Marc Randazza, posted a defamatory, false rebuttal on Crystal Cox’s Rip Off Report reviewing her ex-attorney Marc Randazza and his Law Firm Randazza Legal Group.

Ed Magedon of the Rip Off Report highlighted this rebuttal like NO OTHER REBUTTAL on his entire site. He put this on TOP "Update: Must-read blog post about the First Amendment'' and put a Notice to it in the headlines. He leaned the report toward reading the Rebuttal of Kenneth White defaming Crystal Cox and discrediting what Crystal Cox had posted in her original report.

Clearly Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report was favoring Randazza and joining in the retaliation of Marc Randazza's former client Crystal Cox.

The record clearly shows that Marc Randazza did not believe he was being extorted and in fact, stated that he knew his former client Crystal Cox was asking for a Job. See Exhibit 17.  

As the Record Clearly Shows, Marc Randazza SWORE to Federal courts and engaged in a widespread defamatory campaign against his former client, Crystal Cox and inventor Eliot Bernstein.

Marc Randazza maliciously claimed we had somehow extorted him, when the record, clearly and convincingly, PROVES that Marc Randazza, himself, KNEW he was not being extorted.

Therefore Marc Randazza maliciously, with actual malice and with full knowledge of it's falsehood, told the courts and WIPO in sworn documents and told media worldwide that Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein had extorted him, knowing that it was NOT TRUE.

Kenneth White, as seen in the TOP of Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report, took a private email from Crystal Cox to her former attorney and painted Crystal Cox in false light as if that was the only email and not the entire thread and as if Randazza really believed Cox was extorting him, which he clearly did not, as Exhibit 17 shows.

Exhibit 22, is a blog post from attorney (Randazza Legal Groupie) Ken White's blog, Popehat.com, as seen posted on the TOP of Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report reviewing her former attorney.

Exhibit 22 proves that these attorneys acted together to destroy Crystal Cox's intellectual property, online reputation, to paint her in false light and deliberately, willfully and wantonly ruin her life, with total disregard for the law and for their duty and obligations to society as attorneys. And with full knowledge that what they were posting was false.

Exhibit 22 proves that these attorneys were targeting Crystal Cox's domain names, prying into her private information and launching an attack. All based on the third party false and defamatory statements made by Crystal Cox's vengeful former attorney, Marc Randazza.

Exhibit 22 shows that Randazza sued  Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein to create a pattern and history to attempt to set up his former client Cox, of which he owed client attorney duties to and to set up Inventor Eliot Bernstein.  They were creating a false "pattern and history" using privileged emails to attorneys that were not extortion, not adjudicated fact, not permissible by the rules of evidence as a matter of law and should not have been posted online, period, as a matter of law.



On April 30th, 2015, Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report changed Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report griping about and reviewing her former attorney Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group. 

The Report had been in the top ten of the Google search results for over a year. Marc Randazza, Cox alleges, wanted to change the search and so he had Ed Magedon of the Rip Off Report manipulate Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report to help First Amendment attorney Marc Randazza "save face".  Crystal Cox alleges this to be discriminatory and aiding and abetting the cover up of information.

Not only this, Ed Magedon of the Rip Off Report used Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report and 1.5 years of search engine ranking and links to deliberately, intentionally paint Crystal Cox in false light and to flat out lie about Crystal Cox.

Instead of the Rip Off Report Reading; Marc Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, the Title of Crystal Cox's Report about her former attorney Marc Randazza, Ed Magedson of Rip Off Report changed the title to:   "Crystal Cox lost case in 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, “Cox apparently has a history of making similar allegations and seeking payoffs in exchange for retraction” (((REDACTED BY EDITOR DUE TO ABUSE OF WEBSITE)))"

Ed Magedon of the Rip Off Report also edited and redacted pages and pages of Crystal Cox's rip off report and removed the words "Marc Randazza" and "Randazza Legal Group", from pages of pages of the report. Now the Report makes no sense and is a muddled mess.

It is well known that Ed Magedon of the Rip Off Report NEVER removes Rip Off Reports, however in this report he did worse. He changed, manipulated and thereby falsified the entire report. Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report clearly, deliberately chilled the speech of Crystal Cox and violated her First Amendment rights in favor or an alleged Free Speech advocate Marc Randazza of whom Crystal Cox was truthfully reporting on.

It is a well known, highly publicized fact that I, Crystal Cox won my Ninth Circuit appeal and that this Landmark Ruling took away the long standing monopoly of Free Speech in which Big Media and institutionalized press have had. And now all bloggers have equal rights to that of the biggest, richest media journalists and reporters out there.

For Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report to intentionally paint me, Crystal Cox in false light and deliberately defame me, in order to aid and abet Marc Randazza's harassment and defamatory campaign against me, his former client, is highly unethical, is possibly illegal, is certainly discriminating and I allege is part of the Criminal Defamation of Marc Randazza, Kenneth White, Randazza Legal Group, NPR, Forbes, the New York Times, and many legal bloggers and other co-conspirators that have worked with and aided and abetted Marc Randazza in what I allege to be Criminal Defamation as per,

Here is a former blog post of what the Rip Off Report use to Look Like (PDF coming soon)
http://unethicalscumattorney.blogspot.ie/2014/02/marc-randazza-rip-off-report-yeah-i.html

Here is what Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report about Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group looked like AFTER Ed Magedson REDACTED it. And check out the title, even THOUGH the whole world knows that I WON my Ninth Circuit MAJOR Free Speech Case.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bzn2NurXrSkiLVI3WFY0ZTk2REE/edit

Here is it what Crystal Cox's Rip Off Report about Marc Randazza and Randazza Legal Group looked like AFTER I, Crystal Cox, emailed Ed Magedson and asked him why he was flat out LYING about my Ninth Circuit Appeal Case.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/r/REDACTED-BY-EDITOR-DUE-TO-ABUSE-OF-WEBSITE/Las-Vegas-Nevada/Crystal-Cox-case-in-9thnbspCircuit-Court-of-Appeals-Cox-apparently-has-a-history-of-1112488

Crystal Cox was NEVER on Trial for Extortion, never had a complaint filed for extortion.

Crystal Cox reports on corruption to the best of her ability and provides documented proof, to the best of her ability.

Crystal Cox has no history of extortion, and never received money to remove anything. The New York Times said she did, and Ninth Circuit judges used that as evidence, though hearsay.


Check Out Crystal Cox's appeal of what the Ninth Circuit judges said;

The email that Randazza painted to the world as extortion in the Crystal Cox Free Speech case, was a settlement negotiation. It was CLEARLY sent after Crystal Cox was sued, and had NOTHING to do with why she was sued.

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report is favoring corrupt, unlawful, unethical, and unconstitutional attorneys. And discriminating against law abiding, ethical, anti-corruption bloggers who are trying to help victims of that corruption.

Ed Magedson of the Rip Off Report has a true history of making money from people posting on his site and from removing those posts. Crystal Cox, me, has never engaged in extortion, never been investigated for extortion and does NOT have a history of posting online and asking money for a retraction, PERIOD. It NEVER EVER happened. Ed Magedson does not respect facts, he simply jumps on the bandwagon of Marc Randazza and aids and abets those who really are acting outside of law, ethics and our constitutional rights.


The Randazza Legal Groupies still ROAR about me being an extortionist, attacking an infant and all manner of defamatory, retaliating, hateful nonesense. However, the FACTS are ALL out there and the TRUTH remains to be the TRUTH. As I, Crystal Cox, having been reporting for nearly a decade now. Believe what makes you sleep best at night. Still the TRUTH is the TRUTH. 


Research Link on Exhibits
http://unconstitutionalattorney.blogspot.ie/2015/05/marc-randazza-does-bully-people-to.html
↧
Viewing all 505 articles
Browse latest View live
Search